From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A55B9F6
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 30 May 2014 21:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com
	[66.63.167.143])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208EA20278
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 30 May 2014 21:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1401484253.2364.3.camel@dabdike>
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:10:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20140530151026.GE24054@tuxdriver.com>
References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1405281847450.1280@utopia.booyaka.com>
	<1401304315.13546.142.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
	<20140528191514.GE13255@tuxdriver.com>
	<20140530105938.62fd566d@gandalf.local.home>
	<20140530151026.GE24054@tuxdriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC]
 Encouraging more reviewers)
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400
> > "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> 
> > > I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type...
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about:
> > 
> > Approved-by: ...
> > 
> > That is reserved for maintainers only?
> 
> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better.

Bikeshedded-by:?

Discussed-in-circles-by:?

Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:?

OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly
clear and we don't need a new tag.

James