From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8498979 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 20:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from g9t1613g.houston.hp.com (g9t1613g.houston.hp.com [15.240.0.71]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6951F968 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 20:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from g5t1625.atlanta.hp.com (g5t1625.atlanta.hp.com [15.192.137.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g9t1613g.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB016022A for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 20:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1400013611.2575.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:40:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140513163648.55e7bab3@gandalf.local.home> References: <53662254.9060100@huawei.com> <53699F27.9040403@hitachi.com> <1399431538.2581.30.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <5369EE59.9040805@hitachi.com> <20140507083936.GY26088@console-pimps.org> <536A1CC3.5090506@hitachi.com> <536AF7F4.6010608@hitachi.com> <5370706E.6000108@hitachi.com> <20140513163648.55e7bab3@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 16:36 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2014 15:55:42 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > Agreed. I'd like to suggest adding UT: tag or TS: tag for unit test > > for testsuite to MAINTAINERS file, which will make clear how to test > > that subsystem when submitting patches. :) > > That's a good idea. > > I still need to post my ftrace tests somewhere. I could add it to > tools/testing/selftests, but I break rule #1: > > * Do as much as you can if you're not root Sorry but *why*? I would have thought that selftests are crash and burn, at your own risk... heck its only used by kernel developers, not sysadmins!