From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable issues
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 19:58:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399431538.2581.30.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53699F27.9040403@hitachi.com>
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 11:49 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/05/04 20:19), Li Zefan wrote:
> > - Testing stable kernels
> >
> > The testing of stable kernels when a new version is under review seems
> > quite limited. We have Dave's Trinity and Fengguang's 0day, but they
> > are run on mainline/for-next only. Would be useful to also have them
> > run on stable kernels?
>
> This might be a kind of off-topic, but I'm interested in the testing
> on the linux kernel, especially standard framework of unit-tests
> for each feature.
I tend to think of LTP as a nice way of doing unit-tests for the uapi.
Fengguang's scripts do include it, iirc, but I'm referring more to unit
level tests. It serves well for changes in ipc, and should also for
other subsystems.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-04 11:19 Li Zefan
2014-05-04 12:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-04 12:54 ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-04 14:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 0:37 ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-05 3:09 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-05 3:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 11:31 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-05 13:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 6:10 ` Michal Simek
2014-05-05 2:47 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-05 13:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-05 15:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-05 15:39 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-05 16:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-05 16:07 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-05 16:17 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-05-05 22:33 ` Greg KH
2014-05-06 3:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-06 4:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-06 10:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-05 3:22 ` Greg KH
2014-05-04 15:35 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-05-04 15:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 3:00 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-05 1:03 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-07 2:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-07 2:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2014-05-07 8:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-07 8:39 ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-07 11:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-07 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-08 3:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-09 12:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-05-12 6:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-13 20:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-13 20:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-14 1:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-07 18:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-07 9:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-07 14:15 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-08 3:38 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-08 9:41 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-08 20:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-09 4:11 ` Greg KH
2014-05-09 5:33 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-09 5:41 ` Greg KH
2014-05-07 3:05 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-07 3:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-05-07 7:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-13 20:46 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399431538.2581.30.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net \
--to=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox