From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: Clarify that removal of Acks needs explanation too
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 08:31:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874iqcrh3b.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126081905.7684-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> writes:
> The paragraph mentions only removal of Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags as
> action needing mentioning in patch changelog, so some developers treat
> it too literally. Acks, as a weaker form of review/approval, should
> rarely be removed, but if that happens it should be explained as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> index 910e8fc9e3c8..9a509f1a6873 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -592,8 +592,9 @@ Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester
> or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending
> next versions. However if the patch has changed substantially in following
> version, these tags might not be applicable anymore and thus should be removed.
> -Usually removal of someone's Tested-by or Reviewed-by tags should be mentioned
> -in the patch changelog (after the '---' separator).
> +Usually removal of someone's Acked-by, Tested-by or Reviewed-by tags should be
> +mentioned in the patch changelog with an explanation (after the '---'
> +separator).
Applied, thanks.
jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-29 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 8:19 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-29 15:31 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874iqcrh3b.fsf@trenco.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox