From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] The role of AI and LLMs in the kernel process
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 08:00:16 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7pr38n17-2797-r188-1ss0-o674o68q3356@xreary.bet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTYmE53i3FJ_lJH2@laps>
On Sun, 7 Dec 2025, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 3. Legal risk tolerance:
>
> DCO clause (a) requires certifying "I have the right to submit it under the
> open source license." With AI training data provenance unclear and litigation
> ongoing, how cautious should we be? Some advocate waiting for legal clarity;
> others argue the legal concerns are overblown and we should focus on practical
> guardrails.
In either case, isn't all the legal responsibility with the submitter, who
submitted under the terms of DCO, and thus this particular aspect is not
really a concern for us (maintainers) on the receiving side as per the (c)
DCO clause?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 16:03 Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 17:23 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 17:43 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 17:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:16 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 18:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-05 19:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-05 17:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 13:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 18:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 13:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-05 18:39 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 19:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 20:02 ` James Bottomley
2025-08-05 20:48 ` Al Viro
2025-08-06 19:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-07 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-07 13:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-11 21:26 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-08-12 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-06 4:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2025-08-06 20:36 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-05 21:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2025-08-06 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-06 19:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 19:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-05 18:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-08-05 18:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 5:49 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-06 9:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-06 9:39 ` Julia Lawall
2025-08-06 19:30 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-12 14:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-12 15:02 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-12 15:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-12 15:25 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-12 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-12-08 1:12 ` Sasha Levin
2025-12-08 1:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-08 1:59 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-12-08 3:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-08 3:42 ` James Bottomley
2025-12-08 8:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-08 9:16 ` James Bottomley
2025-12-08 10:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-08 4:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-08 4:31 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-12-08 4:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-08 7:00 ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2025-12-08 7:38 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7pr38n17-2797-r188-1ss0-o674o68q3356@xreary.bet \
--to=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox